Don’t Want to Fall for Fake News? Don’t Be Lazy
Misinformation researchers have proposed two competing hypotheses for why people fall for fake news on social media. The popular assumption—supported by research on apathy over climate change and the denial of its existence—is that people are blinded by partisanship, and will leverage their critical-thinking skills to ram the square pegs of misinformation into the round holes of their particular ideologies. According to this theory, fake news doesn’t so much evade critical thinking as weaponize it, preying on partiality to produce a feedback loop in which people become worse and worse at detecting misinformation.
The other hypothesis is that reasoning and critical thinking are, in fact, what enable people to distinguish truth from falsehood, no matter where they fall on the political spectrum. (If this sounds less like a hypothesis and more like the definitions of reasoning and critical thinking, that’s because they are.)
Several of Rand’s recent experiments support theory number two.
Wenn man selbst schon nicht (mehr) in der Lage ist, seinen gesunden Menschenverstand einzuschalten oder Eigenrecherche zur eigenen Meinungsbildung betreiben, dann kann man wenigstens einige der hier vorgestellten Portale nutzen.